- Abstract
- Recent research on 36 prominent documents on Artificial Intelligence (AI) principles shows that human rights are one of the most critical aspects of Principled AI. These were also addressed in several official documents from a regulative perspective. One of the human rights is the right to health(care). However, in AI-based applications, e.g., care robots, introduced as part of healthcare services and
products, this right is challenged due to privacy, safety, security issues, but also due to accessibility and usability issues, especially if vulnerable users shall interact with these platforms. Thus, we propose discussing how the concept of care gets new valences with the AI-based care robots, from both theoretical and practical perspectives. Ethical aspects are discussed in the light of the integration of care robots in home- and healthcare services. An inclusive theoretical and practical framework is proposed to guide designers, engineers, and roboticists’ design choices in the design of AI applications, such as care robots. The motivation behind this approach lies within the idea of supporting human- autonomy and rights, including the right to health(care). Finally, this work aims to equip the audience with concrete examples of how human- autonomy and rights can be operationalized in practice, beyond their technical- or regulative application.
References:
[1] J. Fjeld, N. Achten, H. Hilligoss, A. Nagy, and M. Srikumar, “Principled Artificial Intelligence: Mapping Consensus in Ethical and Rights-Based Approaches to Princi- ples for AI,” Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY, SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3518482, Jan. 2020. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3518482.
[2] WHO, “The Right to Health,” Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Fact Sheet No. 31. [Online]. Available: https://www.ohchr.org/ documents/publications/factsheet31.pdf
[3] D. Saplacan, W. Khaksar, and J. Torresen, “On Ethical Challenges Raised by Care Robots: A Review,” in Proceedings of The IEEE, 20th International Conference in Advanced Robotics and Its Social Impacts (ARSO), Japan/Virtual, 2021, p. 8. DOI: 10.1109/ARSO51874.2021.9542844
[4] V. Dignum et al., “Ethics by Design: Necessity or Curse?,” in Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, New York, NY, USA, Dec. 2018, pp. 60–66. doi: 10.1145/3278721.3278745.
[5] N. A. Smuha, “Beyond a Human Rights-based approach to AI Governance: Promise, Pitfalls, Plea,” Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY, SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3543112, Feb. 2020. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3543112.
- Presented by
- Diana Saplacan
- Institution
- *Robotics and Intelligent Systems Research Group, Department of Informatics, University of Oslo; **eHealth Research Group, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Agder;
- Keywords
- Artificial Intelligence (AI), ethics, rights, (health)care, robots, studies with-, about-, and for users